What is the Brunner test for student loan discharge in bankruptcy?

The Brunner test is a three-prong legal standard used by most federal courts to determine whether repaying student loans would cause 'undue hardship' under 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(8). The three prongs are: (1) the debtor cannot maintain a minimal standard of living for themselves and dependents if forced to repay the loans, (2) additional circumstances exist showing this state of affairs is likely to persist for a significant portion of the repayment period, and (3) the debtor has made good faith efforts to repay the loans. The test comes from Brunner v. New York State Higher Education Services Corp., 831 F.2d 395 (2d Cir. 1987).

What is an adversary proceeding for student loan discharge?

An adversary proceeding is a lawsuit filed within your bankruptcy case specifically to discharge student loans. Because student loans are presumed nondischargeable, you must file a separate complaint (not just include them in your schedules) and prove undue hardship. The complaint is filed with the bankruptcy court clerk, the lender and DOE are served as defendants, and the case proceeds through discovery and trial like a civil lawsuit. Filing fee is approximately $350.

How did the DOJ 2023 guidance change student loan discharge in bankruptcy?

In November 2022 (effective 2023), the Department of Justice issued guidance directing DOJ attorneys to apply a new analytical framework when evaluating whether to consent to discharge of federal student loans in bankruptcy. Under this guidance, DOJ attorneys consider factors like the borrower's age, disability status, income history, and time since leaving school. If the analysis supports discharge, the DOJ will stipulate to it -- meaning the borrower does not need to go through a full adversary trial. This has significantly increased the number of federal student loan discharges granted in bankruptcy.

Can private student loans be discharged in bankruptcy?

Private student loans are subject to the same 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(8) nondischargeability provision as federal loans, so you still need to prove undue hardship. However, some private loans may not qualify as 'educational loans' under the statute -- for example, loans from non-qualified institutions or loans that exceeded the cost of attendance. If a private loan does not meet the statutory definition, it may be dischargeable without proving undue hardship. An attorney can analyze whether your specific private loans qualify for this argument.

What is the difference between the Brunner test and the totality of circumstances test?

The Brunner test uses three rigid prongs (minimal standard of living, persistence of hardship, good faith effort) and requires the debtor to satisfy all three. The totality of circumstances test, used in the 8th Circuit and some other courts, weighs all relevant factors together without requiring each prong to be independently satisfied. Factors include income, expenses, age, health, dependents, employment prospects, and the debtor's overall financial picture. The totality test is generally considered more debtor-friendly because it does not require the extreme showing of 'certainty of hopelessness' that some courts read into the Brunner test.

Student Loan Bankruptcy Terms You Need to Know -- 25+ Definitions

Core Legal Standards

Undue Hardship: The legal standard required to discharge student loans in bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(8). Congress did not define "undue hardship," so courts have developed their own tests. The two main frameworks are the Brunner test (used in most circuits) and the totality of circumstances test (used in the 8th Circuit). The debtor bears the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence.
Brunner Test: A three-prong test from Brunner v. New York State Higher Education Services Corp., 831 F.2d 395 (2d Cir. 1987). Requires proving: (1) you cannot maintain a minimal standard of living while repaying; (2) additional circumstances show this hardship will persist for a significant portion of the repayment period; and (3) you made good faith efforts to repay. Used by the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 9th, 10th, and 11th Circuits. See the three-prong test breakdown.
Totality of Circumstances Test: An alternative to Brunner used in the 8th Circuit (and adopted by some individual courts elsewhere). Weighs all relevant factors holistically: income, expenses, age, health, number of dependents, employment prospects, maximizing income efforts, and the overall financial picture. Does not require the rigid "certainty of hopelessness" showing that some courts read into Brunner's second prong. See the totality of circumstances guide.
Certainty of Hopelessness: An extreme interpretation of Brunner's second prong requiring the debtor to show that their financial situation is certain to remain dire for the foreseeable future. Some courts have required debtors to prove they have a permanent disability, are elderly, or have exhausted all possible avenues to increase income. This interpretation has been widely criticized as reading more into the statute than Congress intended. The DOJ 2022 guidance and several recent circuit decisions have pushed back against this standard.
Minimal Standard of Living: The first prong of the Brunner test. The debtor must show that repaying the student loans -- at their current income and expenses -- would prevent them from maintaining a basic standard of living for themselves and their dependents. Courts look at income, necessary expenses (housing, food, medical, transportation), and the monthly loan payment. Living modestly is expected -- the standard is "minimal," not "comfortable."
Good Faith Effort: The third prong of the Brunner test. The debtor must demonstrate they made genuine efforts to repay the loans before seeking bankruptcy discharge. Evidence includes: making payments when able, enrolling in income-driven repayment plans, maintaining employment, not living extravagantly, communicating with lenders about hardship, and exploring deferment/forbearance options. See the good faith guide.

Procedures and Filings

Adversary Proceeding: A separate lawsuit filed within your bankruptcy case to determine the dischargeability of student loans. Filed as a complaint with the bankruptcy court clerk. The student loan lender and/or Department of Education are named as defendants. Follows the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (Part VII). Filing fee is approximately $350. See the adversary proceeding guide.
11 U.S.C. 523(a)(8): The Bankruptcy Code provision that excepts student loans from discharge "unless excepting such debt from discharge ... would impose an undue hardship on the debtor and the debtor's dependents." This is the statute that makes student loan discharge difficult -- but not impossible. It applies to both federal and qualifying private student loans.
Partial Discharge: Some courts will discharge a portion of the student loan debt while leaving the rest nondischargeable. For example, discharging accrued interest and penalties while requiring repayment of the original principal. Or discharging some loans but not others. Courts have broad equitable authority here. See the partial discharge guide.
Consent Decree / Stipulated Discharge: When the DOJ (for federal loans) or a private lender agrees to discharge without a trial. Under the 2022 DOJ guidance, if the department's analysis supports discharge, they will stipulate -- the debtor does not need to go through full litigation. This has dramatically shortened and simplified many federal student loan discharge cases.
DOJ/DOE Guidance (November 2022): Formally titled "Guidance on the Treatment of Student Loan Obligations in Bankruptcy." Directs DOJ attorneys to evaluate student loan discharge cases using a standardized analytical framework rather than automatically opposing every request. Considers: borrower age, disability, income and expense history, loan repayment history, time since leaving school, and whether the borrower obtained a degree. Has led to a significant increase in federal student loan discharges since 2023. See the DOJ guidance breakdown.
FRBP Part VII: Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Part VII governs adversary proceedings. Incorporates many Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Requires a formal complaint, answer, discovery, motions practice, and trial. The process is more formal and time-consuming than a typical bankruptcy matter, which is why attorney representation is strongly recommended.

Loan Types and Repayment Programs

Federal Direct Loans: Student loans issued directly by the U.S. Department of Education. Includes Subsidized and Unsubsidized Stafford Loans, PLUS Loans (Graduate and Parent), and Direct Consolidation Loans. Subject to 523(a)(8). The DOJ represents the government in adversary proceedings involving these loans.
FFEL Loans (Federal Family Education Loan): Older federal student loans originated by private lenders but guaranteed by the federal government. The FFEL program ended in 2010. These loans may be held by guaranty agencies or private entities. Subject to 523(a)(8) but the DOJ guidance may not directly apply since a private entity holds the debt. Can be consolidated into Direct Loans.
Private Student Loans: Loans from banks, credit unions, or private lenders (e.g., Sallie Mae, SoFi, Earnest). Subject to 523(a)(8) if they meet the statute's definition of a "qualified education loan." Loans from non-accredited institutions, loans exceeding cost of attendance, or loans not used for qualified education expenses may fall outside 523(a)(8) and could be dischargeable without proving undue hardship.
Income-Driven Repayment (IDR): Federal repayment plans that cap monthly payments at a percentage of your discretionary income. Plans include SAVE (formerly REPAYE), PAYE, IBR, and ICR. Relevant to bankruptcy because enrollment in IDR demonstrates good faith effort (Brunner prong 3). Some courts ask why the debtor needs a discharge when IDR payments may be $0/month -- but courts increasingly recognize that 20-25 years of IDR with a tax bomb on forgiven debt can itself constitute hardship.
SAVE Plan (formerly REPAYE): The Saving on a Valuable Education plan. Caps payments at 5% of discretionary income for undergraduate loans (10% for graduate). Forgiveness after 20 years (undergrad) or 25 years (graduate). The Biden administration introduced SAVE in 2023 to replace REPAYE, but the plan has faced legal challenges. Status may depend on current litigation.
Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF): Forgives remaining federal loan balance after 120 qualifying monthly payments while working full-time for a qualifying public service employer. Relevant to bankruptcy because courts consider whether PSLF could resolve the debt without discharge. However, PSLF requires 10 years of qualifying employment -- which may be impossible for disabled or elderly borrowers, supporting the undue hardship argument.
Tax Bomb: When student loan debt is forgiven after the IDR repayment period (20-25 years), the forgiven amount may be treated as taxable income by the IRS. For a debtor with $200,000 in forgiven loans, the resulting tax bill could be $40,000-$60,000 or more. This risk is relevant to the undue hardship analysis because "forgiveness" through IDR is not truly free. Note: the American Rescue Plan Act temporarily excluded forgiven student loans from taxable income through 2025.

Key Case Law

Brunner v. NYSHE Services Corp. (1987): 831 F.2d 395 (2d Cir. 1987). The case that established the three-prong test used by the majority of federal circuits. Marie Brunner filed for bankruptcy shortly after graduating and sought to discharge her student loans. The Second Circuit held she failed to demonstrate undue hardship and established the framework that has dominated student loan bankruptcy law for nearly four decades.
Long v. Educational Credit Management Corp. (2003): 322 F.3d 549 (8th Cir. 2003). The 8th Circuit rejected the Brunner test in favor of a totality of circumstances approach. Held that the "certainty of hopelessness" standard is too rigid and does not reflect the plain meaning of "undue hardship." This decision made the 8th Circuit (AR, IA, MN, MO, NE, ND, SD) the most favorable jurisdiction for student loan discharge cases.
Rosenberg v. New York University (1987): 805 F.2d 417 (2d Cir. 1986). An earlier case sometimes cited alongside Brunner. Established that student loan discharge requires more than the ordinary hardship that accompanies bankruptcy -- hence "undue" hardship rather than just hardship.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Brunner test?

A three-prong legal standard used by most federal circuits: (1) minimal standard of living, (2) persistent hardship, (3) good faith effort to repay. All three must be satisfied to discharge student loans in bankruptcy.

What is an adversary proceeding?

A separate lawsuit filed within your bankruptcy case to discharge student loans. Required because student loans are presumed nondischargeable. Filing fee approximately $350.

Did the DOJ 2023 guidance make it easier to discharge student loans?

Yes. The DOJ now evaluates cases under a standardized framework and will consent to discharge when the analysis supports it, avoiding the need for full adversary litigation in many cases.

Can private student loans be discharged?

They are subject to the same undue hardship standard as federal loans. However, some private loans may not qualify as "educational loans" under the statute and could be dischargeable without proving undue hardship.

What is the difference between the Brunner test and totality of circumstances?

Brunner uses three rigid prongs. Totality of circumstances (8th Circuit) weighs all relevant factors holistically. Totality is generally considered more debtor-friendly.

Check your bankruptcy discharge eligibility with our free screening tool.

Free Discharge Screener

Related Guides Across the Network

About This Data: Content based on federal bankruptcy law (Title 11, U.S. Code), the Brunner test framework, and the DOJ November 2022 guidance on student loan discharge. This is educational content, not legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for your specific situation.